top of page

Corporate Transparency Act: Filing of Beneficial Ownership Information Reports Suspended Again, and the Nationwide Injunction is Back On

Writer's picture: Michael Tarro JrMichael Tarro Jr

Updated: Jan 26


UPDATE**

On January 23, 2025, the US Supreme Court granted the government’s motion to stay the injunction preventing enforcement of the CTA.


As of January 24, 2025, due to other pending litigation, FinCEN has not reinstated reporting requirements. Reporting companies are not currently required to file BOI information, though FinCEN will continue to accept voluntary filings. ****


In a series of judicial ping-pong, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, on December 26, 2024, reinstated the nationwide injunction preventing enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) and halted beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements. No filings under the CTA are currently required by law.


This comes just days after the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) annouced extensions of the filing deadlines for reporting companies.


The Fifth Circuit vacated the stay of the injunction three days after a motion panel issued an order granting the government's motion to stay the district court's preliminary injunction and reimposing the CTA. The panel reasoned that its decision would maintain the "constitutional status quo" pending the court's consideration of the parties' "weighty substantive arguments" and its decision on the merits regarding the CTA's constitutionality. The court also issued an expedited briefing schedule, with the parties submitting their briefs throughout February 2025 and oral argument set for March 25, 2025.


FinCEN also issued a new alert on December 27, 2024 explaining that reporting companies are not actively required to file BOI reports and will not be subject to liability while the Fifth Circuit's order remains in effect. FinCEN did note however that reporting companies may continue to voluntarily submit BOI reports.


Takeaways on the Corporate Transparency Act


  • The law on this issue is extremely fluid and fast changing, and reporting companies and affected individuals should continue to monitor legal developments affecting the CTA's reporting requirements.

  • Whether a reporting company voluntarily files or not, those affected should be prepared to promptly file if the injunction is lifted again.

  • While the injunction remains in place, reporting companies currently have no obligations to comply with the BOI reporting requirements.

  • Regardless of when the reporting company was formed or registered, the injunction applies to initial reports, corrections, updates, and other CTA-related filings.

  • The Fifth Circuit made clear that the constitutional problems presented by the CTA cannot be resolved quickly and the parties have a full opportunity to be heard.

  • The Fifth Circuit's imposition of an expedited briefing schedule defines a more clear path to the CTA's ultimate impact, and more clearly relieves reporting companies from fast approaching compliance obligations.

  • The impending Trump presidency and Republican control of both houses of Congress further complicates things, as elected officials take office before the case schedule occurs and it is not clear what steps Congress or the administration will take in enforcing the CTA.

  • Another monkey wrench is the impending decision in National Small Business United v. Yellen, the original CTA case out of Alabama, as well as the likelihood of an appeal to the US Supreme Court by the non-prevailing party in Texas Top Cop Shop.


For more information or questions in this area, please use our Contact form on the homepage.


Comments


  • LinkedIn
  • Threads

© 2024 by Tarro Law Associates, PC. 

The information contained in the Tarro Law Associates, PC ("Tarro Law") website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter.

 

No recipient of content from this site, client or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient's state. The content of this website contains general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. Tarro Law expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this site.

 

Any information sent to Tarro Law via Internet e-mail or through the Tarro Law Web site is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis. The transmission of the Tarro Law site, in part or in whole, and/or communication with Tarro Law via Internet e-mail through this site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between Tarro Law and any recipients. Prior case results and client testimonials do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. 

 

The firm does not necessarily endorse, and is not responsible for, any third-party content that may be accessed through this website.

bottom of page